Hong Kong Stablecoin

A Licensing Milestone Drawing Global Attention

On May 21, 2025, Hong Kong’s Legislative Council passed a landmark Stablecoins Ordinance, creating a full licensing regime for fiat-referenced stablecoins (FRS). The law—administered by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA)—takes effect on August 1, 2025, and requires any entity issuing FRS in Hong Kong or referencing the Hong Kong dollar to be licensed. It also governs who may offer FRS to the public, with detailed requirements on reserves, redemption and disclosures. The move is intended to safeguard users, boost market integrity, and position Hong Kong as a high-trust hub for digital-asset payments and tokenized finance.

Importantly, HKMA has paired legislation with implementation guidelines and a sandbox it launched in 2024 for would-be issuers. Early sandbox participants include JD Coinlink (Jingdong), RD InnoTech (RD Technologies), and a consortium led by Standard Chartered (Hong Kong)—a signal that incumbent finance and large platforms intend to play. Regulators have also been clear that only a handful of licences will be granted initially to keep risks contained.

The Policy at a Glance: From “Wait and See” to “License and Supervise”

Hong Kong’s regime targets fiat-referenced stablecoins—tokens pegged to official currencies—and embeds the principle of “same activity, same risks, same regulation”. Practically, that means 1:1 high-quality reserves, robust T+0 redemption processes, and ongoing transparency in how reserves are managed. HKMA stresses the framework is technology-neutral but outcome-driven: stability, solvency, and auditability first.

Core Requirements (Highlights)

  • Licence & perimeter: Issuers of FRS in Hong Kong (and those referencing HKD) must be licensed by HKMA; offering FRS to the public is restricted to permitted/regulated entities.
  • Financial resources: Minimum HK$25 million paid-up share capital (higher amounts may be imposed); liquidity and “excess liquid capital” hurdles apply.
  • Reserves & redemption: Fully reserved with high-quality liquid assets; clear, timely redemption; monthly attestations and annual audits.
  • User protection: No interest (or interest-like returns) may be paid to stablecoin holders; emphasis on governance, risk management, and disclosure via an audited white paper.
  • AML/CFT & controls: Strong KYC/AML, on-chain surveillance, and incident-response playbooks (blacklists, address freezes) built into the operating model.

How to Apply: A Phased, High-Bar Licensing Process

HKMA is encouraging interested parties to contact the authority as the regime goes live, but has warned that only a few licences will be issued at the start. This is consistent with its sandbox approach—learn by supervising pilots with big-cap, risk-controlled institutions—before widening the gates. In short: high bar now; broader access later.

Compared with the U.S. patchwork or the EU’s MiCA registration pathways, Hong Kong’s first wave is tighter and more curated, prioritizing issuers that can meet steep capital, audit, and operational standards from day one.

Market Reaction: Capital Is Mobilizing, Fast

Since passage of the bill, Hong Kong has seen a rush of corporate fund-raisings to build stablecoin and blockchain-payment capabilities, with reported equity placements topping US$1.5 billion in July 2025. Analysts (including Citi) estimate Hong Kong’s addressable stablecoin market could reach a median of ~US$16 billion, depending on uptake and use cases. Meanwhile, HKMA keeps telling the market to “rein in the euphoria”—a reminder that prudence will guide early issuance.

Who’s Competing, and With What Strategy

Today’s global market is dominated by USDT and USDC (together ~85% by market value/volume). In Hong Kong, expect USD-pegged coins to remain important even as HKD- and CNH-linked initiatives gain ground for cross-border payments and treasury use cases. The sandbox cohort suggests three lanes of competition:

  1. Global finance (e.g., Standard Chartered-led consortium) aiming for bank-grade issuance;
  2. Mainland tech/payment platforms (e.g., JD Coinlink) targeting commerce and settlement;
  3. Local Web3 firms partnering with licence holders to access rails compliantly.

Technical Playbook: Turning Regulation Into Code

Hong Kong’s guidelines effectively push issuers to “protocolize” compliance—baking regulatory outcomes into smart-contract design and operational tooling:

  • Attestable reserves & on-chain disclosures (white paper updates; monthly attestations; audit trails).
  • Risk controls on-chain (blacklists, freeze functions, multi-sig upgrades with timelocks).
  • KYC/AML integration that preserves privacy (industry is exploring zk-KYC, DID, and labeled-address analytics).
  • Interoperability & bridges: As issuers go multi-chain, security and transparency for cross-chain reserves and redemptions become paramount; many will lean on zk-rollups and standardized cross-chain messaging to reduce bridge risk.

Bottom line: “Regulation as code” is not a slogan in Hong Kong—issuers will have to prove, not merely promise, that reserves, redemptions, and risk controls work as designed.

Why This Matters Beyond Hong Kong

Policymakers on the Mainland are cautiously eyeing yuan-linked stablecoins for cross-border trade while keeping tight capital-control guardrails. In this context, Hong Kong is the test bed: a common-law, open-capital hub where a small number of high-quality licences can seed institutional-grade rails. Expect early use cases to skew B2B (settlement, trade finance, wholesale payments) before trickling down to retail.

Globally, stablecoin throughput is already enormous and rising—Visa/Allium data shows US$5.7 trillion in stablecoin transaction value in 2024—so adding a gold-standard jurisdiction for issuance should accelerate serious adoption across banks, fintechs, and corporates.

Risks & Challenges: What Issuers (and Users) Should Watch

  • Licence scarcity & timing: With only a few approvals expected initially, latecomers may need to partner rather than build from scratch.
  • Capital and ops burden: The HK$25 million capital floor plus strict liquidity/audit rules will weed out under-resourced teams.
  • No-interest rule: Eliminates “yield” marketing, pushing issuers to compete on reliability and integration rather than teaser rates.
  • Bridge/interop risk: Multi-chain issuance must reconcile on-chain balances with off-chain reserves cleanly—especially during stress.
  • Market psychology: HKMA has warned repeatedly against hype; traders should expect fewer licences and more supervision than the rumor mill implies.

Outlook: A “Hong Kong Standard” for Compliant Stablecoins

By combining a clear legal perimeter with bank-grade controls, Hong Kong is attempting to turn stablecoins into trusted payment instruments, not speculative chips. The first movers—banks, payment giants, and credible crypto firms—are likely to set the template for audits, disclosures, and on-chain controls that others will emulate. If successful, the Hong Kong model could become an exportable compliance stack for other jurisdictions, particularly in Asia.

Hotcoin Official Site: https://www.hotcoin.com
Hotcoin Twitter: https://x.com/HotcoinGlobal
Hotcoin Telegram: https://t.me/HotcoinEX
Hotcoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/hotcoinzh
Hotcoin Chinese Community: https://t.me/hotcoinglobalcn
Hotcoin YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@hotcoinglobal